Trading 212 vs IronFX 2024

Trading 212 is not publicly traded and does not operate a bank. Trading 212 is authorized by two Tier-1 regulators (Highly Trusted), zero Tier-2 regulators (Average Trust), zero Tier-3 regulators (Low Trust), and zero Tier-4 regulators (High-Risk). Trading 212 is authorised by the following Tier-1 regulators: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and regulated in the European Union via the MiFID passporting system.

IronFX is not publicly traded and does not operate a bank. IronFX is authorised by three tier-1 regulators (high trust), zero tier-2 regulators (average trust), zero tier-3 regulators (low trust), and one tier-4 regulator. IronFX is authorised by the following tier-1 regulators: Australian Securities & Investment Commission (ASIC), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and regulated in the European Union via the MiFID passporting system.

Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.

IronFX has come a long way to rebuild its brand, acquiring multiple regulatory licenses to improve its Trust Score, and creating balanced educational material. That said, pricing is an area where Iron FX has room to further improve as spreads appeared higher than the industry average.

To open a trading account with Trading 212, you'll need to make an initial minimum deposit of €10.

IronFX requires a minimum deposit of $50 before you can open an account and start trading.

It's important to make sure that your forex broker accepts the funding options and deposit methods that work best for you. Trading 212 offers Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit), Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) and PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) for banking, whereas IronFX provides Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit), Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw), Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) and Neteller (Deposit/Withdraw).

Comparing the trading costs of forex and CFDs is not easy. Not every broker publishes average spread data, and pricing structures vary. Based on our thorough, data-driven testing of each broker's commissions and fees, we found that Trading 212 offers better pricing overall for traders.

Methodology: When testing each broker's commissions, fees, and pricing, we analyze multiple trade scenarios and award points based on the expansiveness (or inexpensiveness) of the broker's spreads. We then run multiple scenarios for different investor types, incorporating any miscellaneous fees, to determine an "all-in" cost per trade. Learn more about how we test.

At ForexBrokers.com, we track over 110 international regulatory agencies and sort them by tiers (Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3, Tier-4, and Tier-5) to help you choose well-regulated, highly trusted forex brokers. Learn more about our proprietary Trust Score rating system. Based on our research on the regulatory status of over 60 brokers, we've found that IronFX holds 3 global Tier-1 licenses, while Trading 212 holds 2. Both Trading 212 and IronFX hold 0 global Tier-2 licenses.

After evaluating each broker based on their number of held licenses, years in business, and a range of other data-driven variables, we've determined that IronFX (83) earned a higher Trust Score than Trading 212 (79).

To compare the trading platforms of both Trading 212 and IronFX, we tested each broker's trading tools, research capabilities, and mobile apps. For trading tools, Trading 212 offers a better experience. With research, IronFX offers superior market research. Finally, we found Trading 212 to provide better mobile trading apps.

Here’s what trading platforms are available at Trading 212:

• Proprietary Platform - Yes
• Web Platform - Yes
• cTrader - No
• DupliTrade - No
• MT4 - No
• MT5 - No
• ZuluTrade - No
• TradingView - No

Here’s what trading platforms are available at IronFX:

• Proprietary Platform - No
• Web Platform - Yes
• cTrader - No
• DupliTrade - No
• MT4 - Yes
• MT5 - No
• ZuluTrade - No
• TradingView - No

The MetaTrader trading platform suite is wildly popular among forex and CFD traders across the globe. IronFX offers MetaTrader 4 (MT4), while Trading 212 does not. Forex traders also appreciate the ability to engage in social copy trading. While IronFX offers copy trading, Trading 212 does not.

Trading 212 provides traders 146 currency pairs (e.g., EUR/USD) compared to IronFX's 83 available pairs. If you are interested in trading CFDs, Trading 212 offers traders access to 8025 CFDs, while IronFX offers access to 340 CFDs; so Trading 212 offers 7685 more CFDs than IronFX.

We found in our testing that Trading 212 offers a more diverse selection of investment options than IronFX, allowing you to trade Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs), U.S. Stocks (CFD), Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) and Cryptocurrency (Derivative). Neither have Cryptocurrency (Physical) and Spread Betting.